Leadership Knowledge Network articles
Failing to cope with change?
An excellent article by Stefan Stern, Financial Times reports on a recent survey about change in organizations where 37 per cent of UK board members believed that their change programmes were generally successful, only 5 per cent of middle managers did!
What do managers get wrong about change? There is quite a long list. They underestimate how long it will take to get people to accept change. They fail to recognise how difficult it is to spread the message that change may be necessary or unavoidable. They do not understand what change feels like beyond the boardroom or the top management table. And, having finally got the organisation to accept the need for change, they forget to explain that the new direction or mission may change again, and possibly quite soon.
Training +Coaching = a winning combination
If training is to deliver real returns, then people must transfer what they learn back into new ways of acting within the workplace. I think we can all remember leaving a program armed with good intentions that soon get lost amidst the many demands on our time at work. In fact, research suggests that only 15-22% of learning is transferred back into workplace behaviour and subsequent changes in productivity.
via Training + Coaching: A Winning Combination.
Googleadership - well they just have to take over everything!
Great news for those “leaders” who don’t like talking to staff, coaching them or, well, leading. There’s a new leadership style that avoids the necessity of using any of this soft, fluffy stuff. Just use Googleadership – and get the search engine giant to tell you who is going to quit, who’s unhappy…

Google works out mathematical formula to indicate staff who are likely to quit.
Organisational agility: how business can survive and thrive in turbulent times – EIU
New research from the Economist Intelligence Unit shows that organisational agility is the key to survive and thrive in turbulent times.
Organisational agility: how business can survive and thrive in turbulent times examines the challenges and rewards of organisational agility, particularly in tough economic times. The major findings are as follows:
- Organisational agility is a core differentiator in today’s volatile business environment
- Yet most companies admit they are not sufficiently flexible to compete successfully
- Internal barriers hamper agile change efforts.
- Technology can play an important supporting role in enabling organisations to become more agile
Read the full EIU report hereIf you don’t yet have Agile leadership you are going to seriously struggle becoming an agile organisation. Isn’t it time that you developed your leadership agility?
Ten Signs of incompetent managers
How do you identify the members of your team that could sink it? Get an expert’s tips on the signs you should look for.
via Ten Signs of Incompetent Managers | Fast Company.
Bias against action:There are always plenty of reasons not to take a decision, reasons to wait for more information, more options, more opinions. But real leaders display a consistent bias for action. People who don’t make mistakes generally don’t make anything. Legendary ad man David Ogilvy argued that a good decision today is worth far more than a perfect decision next month. Beware prevaricators.
Secrecy: “We can’t tell the staff,” is something I hear managers say repeatedly. They defend this position with the argument that staff will be distracted, confused or simply unable to comprehend what is happening in the business. If you treat employees like children, they will behave that way — which means trouble. If you treat them like adults, they may just respond likewise. Very few matters in business must remain confidential and good managers can identify those easily. The lover of secrecy has trouble being honest and is afraid of letting peers have the information they need to challenge him. He would rather defend his position than advance the mission. Secrets make companies political, anxious and full of distrust.
Over-sensitivity: “I know she’s always late, but if I raise the subject, she’ll be hurt.” An inability to be direct and honest with staff is a critical warning sign. Can your manager see a problem, address it headlong and move on? If not, problems won’t get resolved, they’ll grow. When managers say staff is too sensitive, they are usually describing themselves. Wilting violets don’t make great leaders. Weed them out. Interestingly, secrecy and over-sensitivity almost always travel together. They are a bias against honesty.
Love of procedure: Managers who cleave to the rule book, to points of order and who refer to colleagues by their titles have forgotten that rules and processes exist to expedite business, not ritualize it. Love of procedure often masks a fatal inability to prioritize — a tendency to polish the silver while the house is burning.
Preference for weak candidates: We interviewed three job candidates for a new position. One was clearly too junior, the other rubbed everyone up the wrong way and the third stood head and shoulders above the rest. Who did our manager want to hire? The junior. She felt threatened by the super-competent manager and hadn’t the confidence to know that you must always hire people smarter than yourself.
Focus on small tasks: Another senior salesperson I hired always produced the most perfect charts, forecasts and spreadsheets. She was always on time, her data completely up-to-date. She would always volunteer for projects in which she had no core expertise — marketing plans, financial forecasts, meetings with bank managers, the office move. It was all displacement activity to hide the fact that she could not do her real job.
Allergy to deadlines: A deadline is a commitment. The manager who cannot set, and stick to deadlines, cannot honor commitments. A failure to set and meet deadlines also means that no one can ever feel a true sense of achievement. You can’t celebrate milestones if there aren’t any.
Inability to hire former employees: I hired a head of sales once with (apparently) a luminous reputation. But, as we staffed up, he never attracted any candidates from his old company. He’d worked in sales for twenty years — hadn’t he mentored anyone who’d want to work with him again? Every good manager has alumni, eager to join the team again; if they don’t, smell a rat.
Addiction to consultants: A common — but expensive — way to put off making decisions is to hire consultants who can recommend several alternatives. While they’re figuring these out, managers don’t have to do anything. And when the consultant’s choices are presented, the ensuing debates can often absorb hours, days, months. Meanwhile, your organization is poorer but it isn’t any smarter. When the consultant leaves, he takes your money and his increased expertise out the door with him.
Long hours: In my experience, bad managers work very long hours. They think this is a brand of heroism but it is probably the single biggest hallmark of incompetence. To work effectively, you must prioritize and you must pace yourself. The manager who boasts of late nights, early mornings and no time off cannot manage himself so you’d better not let him manage anyone else.
Any one of these behaviours should sound a warning bell. More than two — sound the alarm!
More Articles...
Page 1 of 2
<< Start < Prev 1 2 Next > End >>Get the book
Latest Articles
- Developing Managers Using Simulations (2010-08-13)
- CELSIM Advantage Programmes (2010-08-12)
- Schedule an appointment with us (2009-11-13)
- Why we use simulations - White Paper (2010-06-02)
- About CELSIM (2009-10-16)



![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=5b531a7f-4e84-4bf0-9c7e-a4847718cdd3)


